Elephant in Battle
Artist/maker unknown, Indian
Geography:
Made in Kota, Rajasthan, India, Asia
Date:
c. 1750-1770Medium:
Opaque watercolor, gold, and silver on paperDimensions:
Sheet: 15 7/8 × 18 15/16 inches (40.3 × 48.1 cm)Curatorial Department:
South Asian ArtObject Location:
1994-148-394Credit Line:
Stella Kramrisch Collection, 1994
Made in Kota, Rajasthan, India, Asia
Date:
c. 1750-1770Medium:
Opaque watercolor, gold, and silver on paperDimensions:
Sheet: 15 7/8 × 18 15/16 inches (40.3 × 48.1 cm)Curatorial Department:
South Asian ArtObject Location:
Currently not on view
Accession Number:1994-148-394Credit Line:
Stella Kramrisch Collection, 1994
Label:
The Indian elephant was used as a primary battle engine for over two thousand years across the subcontinent and was valued by rulers far above horses. In this painting, a heavily armored battle elephant rampages across a bright yellow Weld amid troops mounted on horses. On his back are two soldiers armed with spears, arrows, and swords; the foremost is the mahout who wields the elephant goad that could give a trained elephant over a hundred commands by gentle touches to different parts of the animal's body. The elephant has chains on its legs and carries more in its trunk. They would have served as flails to attack the enemy infantry. At some point after its making, this vivid painting appears to have been cut down from a larger work and an apparently spurious inscription was added on the back.
The Indian elephant was used as a primary battle engine for over two thousand years across the subcontinent and was valued by rulers far above horses. In this painting, a heavily armored battle elephant rampages across a bright yellow Weld amid troops mounted on horses. On his back are two soldiers armed with spears, arrows, and swords; the foremost is the mahout who wields the elephant goad that could give a trained elephant over a hundred commands by gentle touches to different parts of the animal's body. The elephant has chains on its legs and carries more in its trunk. They would have served as flails to attack the enemy infantry. At some point after its making, this vivid painting appears to have been cut down from a larger work and an apparently spurious inscription was added on the back.